Grey

-
Is a clergyman, who sustains themselves by taking advantage of people blinded by the illusion of eternal bliss, morally superior to a sex worker providing for their family with dignity?

On what grounds can we justify an enraged mob violently assaulting a thief who was denied employment due to a lack of education?

Does having tattoos and body piercings automatically brand someone as a drug addict or a criminal?

Would you condemn a mother who relinquishes her child due to an inability to provide, or a pedophile who adopts vulnerable children to exploit them?

Is a soldier who kills out of duty more morally upright than a terrorist who kills out of conviction?

What defines what is right and what is wrong? Does another person's beliefs become inherently wrong if they conflict with your own? And if right and wrong are subjective to each individual's beliefs, should the concepts of right and wrong even exist?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ants and Mosquitoes

-
Image
Among the most underappreciated and ill-treated creatures on Earth are undoubtedly ants and mosquitoes. Ants embody the ideals of hard work and commitment. Among the countless insect species, they exhibit remarkable organization and possess the ability to carry loads weighing ten times their own body weight. Even when faced with adversaries thousands of times their size, ants courageously defend their colonies. If an ant happens to bite us, it pays the ultimate price with its life. It matters not whether the bite was an act of self-defense. The ant bites, we feel the sting, and we crush its life away. Such is the way of things, it seems. For a humble creature like an ant, the due process holds no relevance. Mosquitoes face a similar fate. Every creature possesses the innate instinct to nourish itself. For mosquitoes, blood serves as their sustenance. It is not the mosquito's fault that it feeds on blood; it is merely the way it was created. The mosquito remains oblivious to the dis...
Read more

Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief

-
Image
Here we have another movie adaptation of a book, which seems to be the prevailing trend these days. Sometimes I ponder why anyone would bother buying a book when a movie version is soon to follow. A friend of mine has a habit of watching the movie first and then reading the book for comparison. I advised her not to bother because, more often than not, the book always surpasses the movie. Watching a movie based on a book is like witnessing someone else's interpretation of the story, and that someone has to alter the context significantly. It's understandable since Hollywood has its limitations, unlike the boundless realms of our imaginations. The film's producers can't faithfully replicate the book word for word due to constraints of budget and time. So here's my advice to you: If you're a fan of the book, stick with it. Don't expect the movie version to capture the essence of the book exactly as it is. I've been disappointed multiple times by this, parti...
Read more