Hired: Who you know VS What you know

I had a job interview yesterday, and this morning I received an email saying that I got the job! I can't stop smiling as I type this. Maybe those candles played a small part, like 10% or so, but the main reason I got hired was that my aunt's friend referred me to the manager of a hotel. That referral was the key factor in landing me the job.

Some people might argue that getting a job through connections rather than solely based on merit is somewhat pathetic. I used to think that way too. But not anymore.

It is pathetic when you secure a job through a referral and then turn out to be terrible at it. If someone vouches for you, at least try not to disappoint them. Otherwise, it's better not to seek the position in the first place.

That's why getting into a company through connections comes with added pressure. You're not only carrying your own reputation; you're also carrying the reputation of the person who referred you.

On the other hand, getting hired without a referral is challenging. My two months of unsuccessful job hunting are proof of that. Why? It's simple logic. If you were an employer, whom would you choose: a candidate with the required skill set or a candidate with the required skill set who is trusted by someone you know? The answer is obvious, right?

I believe that the only time an applicant without a referral can get hired is when they are exceptionally qualified for the job or when the candidates with referrals are truly underwhelming.

So let's not judge people who get into a company because they know someone inside. Those insiders are not going to risk their own positions for someone they know is incompetent. Let's also respect those who manage to get in without any help; what they accomplished is not an easy feat.

The important thing is... I HAVE A JOB NOW! WOOHOO!

Wait, I'll have to wear a suit for this job. Damn it. (– _ –)